- Home
- Guides & blog
- How-to
How to write a security incident report that holds up
The structure, the language and the photographs that make a report useful to a client, an insurer or a court.
Most security incident reports are written badly, and it costs money. A vague report cannot support an insurance claim, cannot be forwarded to a client without editing, and falls apart if a solicitor reads it eighteen months later. The fix is not more writing — it is a consistent structure and a few habits.
The structure
Every report should answer six things, in this order:
- When — exact date and time the incident occurred, not when it was written up.
- Where — the site and the specific location within it. "North gate, pedestrian entrance", not "outside".
- Who — the reporting officer, plus anyone involved or present, described factually.
- What happened — a chronological account of what was observed.
- What was done — the actions taken, in order, including who was contacted and at what time.
- What is outstanding — anything requiring follow-up, and by whom.
Facts, not conclusions
This is the single biggest improvement available to most reports.
| Weak | Strong |
|---|---|
| A suspicious male was hanging around | A male, approx. 6ft, dark hooded top, jeans, remained by the fence line for approx. 4 minutes |
| He tried to break in | He pulled twice on the padlock securing the compound gate, then walked north on Mill Lane |
| The damage was probably vandalism | Panel 14 of the perimeter fence was bent outward at the base; no tool marks visible |
| I called it in straight away | Control room notified at 02:47 by phone; police called at 02:51, ref XX/1234/26 |
The pattern is the same each time: replace the conclusion with the observation that led to it. If the conclusion is right, the reader will reach it themselves — and the report survives being challenged.
Photographs: three, not one
Insurers and clients consistently ask for the same three shots, and officers consistently take only the middle one.
- Wide — shows where this is on the site, with a recognisable landmark in frame.
- Mid — shows what happened in context.
- Close — shows the detail: the damage, the mark, the item.
Take them on the app rather than on the camera roll. Photographs captured in the reporting app carry their own time and location metadata and are attached to the record, which removes any argument about whether the image is from this incident or an earlier one.
Time is evidence
A handwritten report is time-stamped by whoever wrote the time on it. A digital report submitted from a phone is time-stamped by the system, along with a GPS position. Those two facts turn a description into evidence.
This is also why "write it up at the end of shift" is a bad habit even when the words are identical. Report at the scene, and the time stamp does work for you that the prose cannot.
Log the boring things too
The daily occurrence book is not just for incidents. A delivery at an unusual hour, a door found unlocked, a contractor without a permit, a light out over the yard, a gate left open by a subcontractor — none of these are incidents on the night, and any of them can turn out to be the crucial entry six weeks later.
A digital occurrence log is searchable, which is what makes those entries worth making. Nobody has ever found anything useful by leafing through a hardback notebook.
What good looks like
Incident 2026-0148 — Criminal damage — Severity: Medium
02:41, 14 Feb 2026. Riverside Development, north perimeter, between checkpoints 4 and 5.
During the third patrol of the shift I observed that panel 14 of the perimeter fencing was bent outward at the base, creating a gap of approx. 40cm. The panel was intact and secure during patrol two at 00:35. No persons were present. No tool marks were visible on the panel. Three photographs attached.
I checked the compound and plant area; padlocks intact, no items appeared to be missing. Control room notified at 02:47. Site manager J. Harper notified by text at 02:49. Temporary barrier placed across the gap at 02:55. Remaining patrols increased frequency at this point for the rest of the shift.
Outstanding: permanent fence repair required — site manager informed.
Under two hundred words, entirely factual, chronological, with times and photographs. That report can be forwarded to the client unedited, supports a claim, and still makes sense in two years.
How to get your officers writing like this
- Give them a template, not a blank box. Structured fields produce structured reports.
- Use incident types so the right questions are asked for the right kind of event.
- Make it fast. If filing takes five minutes, it gets done at the scene. If it takes fifteen, it gets done from memory or not at all.
- Feed back. Show officers a report that was used successfully — to win an argument with a client, or to support a claim. It changes how the next one is written.
See how incident reporting works in SMS-Patrol, or book a demo and we will show you a real report end to end.
Related questions
Who, what, where, when, and what was done — plus photographs, the officer's identity, and an accurate time. Facts only, in the order they happened, with no speculation about motive or intent.
At the scene, or as close to it as safety allows. A report written at 02:42 is far stronger evidence than the same words typed at 06:55, and the difference matters if it is ever tested.
No. Record what was observed and what was done. Opinions and assumptions weaken the report and can be used to undermine the factual parts of it.